Christian Community Networking

Blog Page

Christ was a socialist? Really?

Posted by christiancommunitynetworking on August 19, 2011 at 6:35 PM

 Ramon Roane,author/speaker

 

Christ was a socialist? Really?

  

This week I saw a banner online that said “Jesus was a Socialist.” What? I did a double take. I thought I knew Jesus, but I never knew that Jesus was identified as a socialist. I did a word search of the bible from cover to cover for the words socialism or socialist and  found none. So, where did this come from? Mr. Gregory Paul wrote an article for the Washington Post entitled, “From Jesus’ socialism to capitalistic Christianity.” In 550 words or less I would like to examine both the message and the messenger of this article, to see if Christ supports socialism.

  

Socialism is an economic system in which the means of production are publicly or commonly owned and controlled cooperatively. Socialism is a relatively modern construct, a governmental system invented roughly 1,800 years after Christ’s death, not a biblical mandate. The question, then, is how is socialism compatible with Christianity, because the bible doesn’t mandate it?

    

Mr. Paul claimed Jesus was pro-socialist. Since, socialism is a governmental system this would rule Jesus out, because Christ didn’t come to establish a government, but His church. He misinterprets Matthew 19:23-25, the story of the rich young ruler. Jesus was not saying that the rich cannot get into heaven, but if your wealth is your god, then you can’t enter. Then he turns to Acts 2:42, where it reads “And all that believed were together, and had all things common.” Again, he misinterprets the scripture. The things they had in common are what they believed. When the next verse says they sold their possessions, it was not all of their possessions, but they sold accordingly to those in need in the church. All of the above was voluntary.

 

Your giving in the church is always voluntary and not forced. He uses the story of Ananias and Saphhira to support forced giving, because the execution of the couple. Again, Mr. Paul misinterprets the scripture. They were not killed because of how much they gave, but because they lied to the Holy Spirit. Remember, Peter told them it was their money away. Mr. Paul’s whole argument rests on this event.

   

Christianity is incompatible not just with socialism but also many aspects of the modern welfare state. We are called us to help the poor, it is also clear that the poor must help themselves to the extent they are able. The bible warns against idleness and says, “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.”

  

Now, I would like examine the messenger, Mr. Paul. He is an independent researcher on subjects dealing with paleontology, evolution, religion and society. He is also an atheist. Now, this is the problem. We have a non-believer, Mr. Paul, trying to interpret the scriptures. Let’s check the book,

  

1 Corinthians 2:16 (KJV)

For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ.

  

Mr. Paul views the bible as just a book. We Christians view as the Living Word of God. His argument that Christ is pro-socialism doesn’t hold water and Mr. Paul not only needs water, but the belief in the saving grace of Jesus Christ and baptism in the watery grave.

  

What say you?

Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

2 Comments

Reply DJWilliams
11:18 PM on August 19, 2011 
Well, as a former Pastor i have many bibles, i am still trying to find ONE BOOK that jesus wrote or(PEN) They said that he wrote someting on the grown, and said he came for the JEWS. hmmmmm
and Osama bin Laden did not write one BOOK, HE PREACH HATE.
Reply Odysseus7
11:11 AM on August 20, 2011 
Your interpretation of the answer to this question is your thoughtful essay. My interpretation of the answer to this question, is that on a continuum, with socialism at one end and the American Capitalist system on the other end, the Living Word of God would not support the increasing income disparity in this country. The Living Word of God would not endorse the state dictating what religion is the correct one.

The Living Word of God would not have its workers endorsing a system where one religion is able to dictate to others, the definition of marriage. When I got married, the priest said: "By the power vested in me by the State of confusion ;) I now pronounce you __ and ___." Therefore, the State authorizes and delegates this power to various entities. Therefore, once these various entities are established by law, these various entities should be able to say, without the State's veto, who gets to be married.

The Constitution says that it was created to promote the general welfare. At that very moment, the "Welfare State" was created. Four score and seven years later, a war was being fought; NOT because of State's rights only, but because some of the people of that Welfare State didn't want to be required to give up the privileges of chattel slavery. The idle rich Southern secessionists (then and now, i.e. Rick Perry) considered themselves Christians and they justified (then and now) their hateful, racist, in-humane, sexist, misogynistic and (now) anti-poor and anti-gay policies by using the Bible.

So on a continuum between the two extremes, The Living Word of God would be closer to the side of a system where people are more equal, where the people are free to worship and practice their religion without fear of the government instructing their children in what religious interpretation of creation the government dictates. The Living Word of God would not want the government intervening in, and interfering with their practice of religion in their lives. That sounds to me like The Living Word of God would be considered dangerous to the governmental system in place. That's probably one reason why (then and now) He was, (and continues to be?) crucified. I end my essay with the question above. I do so because I have faith. My faith is strengthened by my God and His Son. I also think that it is encouraging to remind ourselves that the first verse of our National Anthem also begins and ends in a question, (as if the great experiment is still going on.)